The Fading Promise of UN Peacekeeping in the Congo
the Blue Helmets are leaving
Introduction
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has been a canvas of conflict for decades, with numerous attempts at peacekeeping failing to bring lasting stability. As the last UN peacekeepers prepare to leave by the end of this year, questions linger about the efficacy of the mission and the broader implications for international peacekeeping efforts. The story of the UN peacekeeping mission in the DRC, known as MONUSCO, reflects the broader crises facing UN peacekeeping today, including issues of legitimacy, changing conflict dynamics, and geopolitical rivalries.
A Historical Context of the Blue Helmets
United Nations peacekeeping missions, symbolized by the iconic blue helmets, were founded on principles of impartiality, consent of the parties, and the non-use of force except in self-defense or defense of the mandate. However, the role of these missions has evolved significantly since the first deployment in 1948. MONUSCO, established in 1999, became the largest and most expensive peacekeeping mission in UN history. Tasked with stabilizing the eastern region of the DRC, it was meant to support the national military and protect civilians amidst a landscape riddled with armed groups and systemic violence (1,2).
The Complex Reality of Peacekeeping in DRC
Despite the ambitious mandate and the deployment of around 16,000 uniformed personnel, MONUSCO has faced significant challenges. The eastern DRC remains a hotbed of violence, with over 100 armed groups operating in the region. The resurgence of the M23 rebel group, allegedly backed by Rwanda, has added to the complexity. Public dissatisfaction with MONUSCO’s performance has grown, leading to demands for the mission's expedited withdrawal (2,3).
President Félix Tshisekedi’s government, reflecting the broader public sentiment, has pushed for a military solution to the ongoing insurgency, turning to regional forces when MONUSCO failed to deliver expected results. This shift underscores a critical issue: the gap between what host countries expect and what UN peacekeeping can realistically achieve (3).
Reasons for Failure: A Crisis of Legitimacy and Changing Conflict Dynamics
The declining effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions can be attributed to several interrelated factors (4):
Changing Nature of Conflict: Modern conflicts are increasingly driven by non-state actors, including identity-based militias, criminal gangs, and jihadist insurgents. These groups often have decentralized structures and transnational links, making traditional peacekeeping strategies less effective .
Unrealistic Mandates: The mandates given by the UN Security Council are often overly ambitious and not well-suited to the realities on the ground. These mandates sometimes require peacekeepers to engage in activities for which they are neither trained nor equipped, such as counter-insurgency operations .
Geopolitical Rivalries: The fragmented international system and the rise of superpower rivalries have further complicated peacekeeping efforts. The ideological divisions within the Security Council have hindered consensus, leading to reduced support for large-scale missions .
The Regional Response and its Limitations
In the face of these challenges, regional organizations like the African Union (AU) have stepped up their efforts, with mixed results. The AU and sub-regional bodies have authorized numerous missions, ranging from small observer teams to large-scale interventions. These missions, while more adaptable and quicker to deploy, often lack the sustainability and comprehensive support needed to build long-term peace (5).
Moreover, the reliance on external funding and support for these regional initiatives has raised concerns about the principle of "African solutions to African problems." The interventions, often designed to support governmental security needs, do not necessarily address the underlying causes of conflict, such as poor governance and lack of development (5,6).
The Human Cost: Impact on Tutsi Communities
The conflict in eastern DRC, particularly involving the M23, has had a severe impact on local Tutsi communities. Many Tutsi have faced discrimination, violence, and displacement, often being unfairly associated with the rebel group. Interviews with displaced Tutsi civilians reveal the deep-seated fear and mistrust that permeate these communities (7).
The government’s collaboration with various militias, including some linked to the 1994 Rwandan Genocide perpetrators, has further complicated the situation. While some efforts have been made to protect Tutsi communities, the broader conflict dynamics continue to put them at risk, leading many to seek refuge in neighboring countries under dire conditions (8).
The Future of Peacekeeping
The impending withdrawal of MONUSCO marks the end of an era for UN peacekeeping in the DRC but also serves as a stark reminder of the limitations and challenges of such missions in contemporary conflict zones. As the UN re-evaluates its role and strategies, it must address the fundamental issues of legitimacy, adaptability, and geopolitical coherence to restore its peacekeeping efforts' credibility and effectiveness.
References
Anyadike, O. (Year). The changing face of peacekeeping: What’s gone wrong with the UN?. The New Humanitarian.
Popoviciu, A., & Livingstone, E. (Year). How the M23 conflict endangers DR Congo’s Tutsi communities. The New Humanitarian.
Dersso, S. (Year). Amani Africa: The crisis in UN peacekeeping. Amani Africa.
Tchie, A. Y. (Year). NUPI: Contemporary UN peace operations. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
de Coning, C. (Year). African-led peace operations and their challenges. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Guterres, A. (Year). New Agenda for Peace. United Nations.
Kitsa, F. (Year). Reporting from Goma: The impact of conflict on local communities. The New Humanitarian.
Rwanyonga, D. (Year). Humanitarian conditions in Nkamira transit camp. The New Humanitarian.